I‘ve read a fair amount about the flipped classroom of late… gotta be honest… I’ve not really been blown away by the concept in the way many have…
To me it doesn’t seem that revolutionary to me… I’m not sure how it is any different to an English teacher giving the class a text to read at home, so they can discuss it the next day in class… Anyone? Beuller? Anyone?
So… as I said let’s really flip it!
What if our extra-curricular activities weren’t extra at all?
What if community service, work experience, inter-faith dialogues, music groups, politics club, science club, the environment club, sporting teams were actually what we focused our time, money, resources and efforts on? What if these formed the curriculum and students could then choose to extend themselves in Maths, English, History, Geography as part of extra curricular clubs?
Would we be worse off? Would our best mathematicians still find their way?
Just an idea… and no, I haven’t thought about how we’d assess it.
**This blog started life on my Big Ideas site, and @SteveCollis commented on it. His comment really added value so I have pasted Steve’s thoughts below. Connect with him on Twitter or check out his website.
I suspect that’s where things are heading.
How long will it take for mass awareness that kids studying online ‘perform’ better than kids in face to face classrooms, to translate into an exodus from traditional schooling structures? These things have a way of tipping quite suddenly. Like Borders / Amazon.
But the community of a school can never be replaced. It is, should be, a beating heart. It could morph into something like you’re describing.
You’d only need a few successful examples of such a model to be strongly popular and it could go viral.
I’m not sure you’d call it ‘school’ any more. Maybe you would.
You could start ‘real life’ sooner with the community model you’re describing. I realise real life is happening anyway, but it could cure the artificial bubble summed up in the question “Yes but when am I going to need to know this?”, “Trust me, you will one day.”
On the other end, it wouldn’t have to finish at age 18, and it could merge seamlessly with tertiary study… and beyond. This new learning-creature could become a permanent institution, rather than an episodic one. It could merge with other spaces you’ve invoked, like the sports field, performance centre… also shopping centre, business district, and so on. It might have multiple tiny campuses in addition to big ones. You plug in wherever you like, and mix and match as desired. In practice people would gravitate to centres-of-gravity and grow a sense of belonging around them, like Englishmen choose their local pub.
With you all the way Dan. The sort of thing you’re describing could come about through natural ‘market forces’ / shift-in-zeitgeist, which makes the scenario particularly credible.